The Endless Frontier Act can help reverse America’s decades-long decline in commercial research. But bridging the gap between universities and corporations won’t be easy.
"Who are the end users for the NSF’s new applied-technology directorate? Well, business." Spot on. Thus, what is also missing is innovation *not* intended for commercialization. Innovations in public goods like health and safety. I'd say we could use a few billion in innovation in policing, for example. Ideally, the act would be strategic: here are our 3-5 top national challenges, and here are the tech areas to meet them. Instead we got: here are some fashionable tech areas that are valuable to Google and DoD, and some of that value could trickle down to you, too. I don't mind picking winners; that's inevitable, as you point out. I mind not being explicit about who is winning and who isn't. Thanks for offering clarity, Roland.
The other thing missing from the (current version of) the Endless Frontier Act is, well, most of the Endless Frontier Act. They gutted it in committee.
"Who are the end users for the NSF’s new applied-technology directorate? Well, business." Spot on. Thus, what is also missing is innovation *not* intended for commercialization. Innovations in public goods like health and safety. I'd say we could use a few billion in innovation in policing, for example. Ideally, the act would be strategic: here are our 3-5 top national challenges, and here are the tech areas to meet them. Instead we got: here are some fashionable tech areas that are valuable to Google and DoD, and some of that value could trickle down to you, too. I don't mind picking winners; that's inevitable, as you point out. I mind not being explicit about who is winning and who isn't. Thanks for offering clarity, Roland.
The other thing missing from the (current version of) the Endless Frontier Act is, well, most of the Endless Frontier Act. They gutted it in committee.
https://www.slowboring.com/p/make-the-endless-frontier-act-great